Slingoor: the bull and the price of attention

Four minutes before the high, the banner is still missing

At 17:54 Paris time, the Slingoor account asks whether anyone has a good banner idea, adding that @slingoorio is a legend. M M B eventually offers to send one. While a market already exists, the character is still looking for its scenery: a revealing glimpse of production rather than a claim that a finished community has arrived. [8] [9]

Four minutes after that request, according to the high supplied to the editorial team, the token reaches $2.39 million in market capitalisation. Its full name is The Black Bull. The logo combines a black bull’s body and horns with a human face wearing dark glasses. The montage gives a body to a personality participants want inside their story. [11]

But the central question is not who will draw the best bull. It appears in a phrase repeated since launch: send 65% of supply in pursuit of something other than tokens in return. Attention, a presence, perhaps a role to perform.

The 65% is part of the script

The contract’s Pump page links to a Batman post published at 16:09. He announces sending 65%, invoking Ansem as the reference. At 17:23, the Slingoor account repeats the formula with the exact token address. The Ansem comparison is explicit in the communication; it is not treated here as verification of another asset’s distribution. [1] [2]

When consulted on November 2, Pump displayed roughly 652 million tokens, or 65.16% of supply according to its table, for the “slingoor” profile it links to @slingoorio. The percentage announced in posts therefore has a concrete counterpart in the displayed distribution. This platform observation is not a transaction-by-transaction reconstruction of every fund’s origin. [3]

Nor does the claimed transfer document an accepted promotion contract. It does place one person at the market’s centre: a substantial share of supply is associated with his profile while other participants also speculate on what he will do with that position. The stock becomes a public invitation with a visible expectation.

The expected response arrives on Pump

The page does more than display a position. A callout by the slingoor profile concerns this exact contract. Batman subsequently celebrates it in his thread and repeats the Solana address. The evidence goes beyond unanswered tags: a contribution appears on Pump at this token’s address. It does not establish that Slingoor performed the original deployment. [3] [4] [5]

The thread also contains small operational gestures. Batman says he is changing fees, then that it is done, then that he is paying for the DEX page. They show a launch being adjusted in public. They do not fully describe every fee’s final destination; receiving tokens and collecting creator fees remain different flows. [1]

“Community” encompasses unequal roles here. Some make artwork; others promote or request visibility. A profile to which Pump attributes close to two-thirds of supply occupies a different scale of position. The collective character is forming around a concentrated centre.

Not everyone applauds the gift

In Batman’s replies, Helin Ulker directly criticises sending tokens to personalities. TheGTradesSol instead proposes overtaking Ansem and presents Slingoor as a better candidate. Their disagreement is about more than price: who should receive the leading role, and whether allocating that much supply is desirable at all. [6] [7]

Under the token account’s post, M4zter Cry calls it the “beg meta”: deploy an asset, then plead with a promoter to push it. The comment is mocking but identifies the staged expectation precisely. The launch’s first proposition is not a technical function; it seeks to turn a person’s attention into activity around a market. [12]

Those objections prevent a story of unanimous support. To one participant, concentration may embody hoped-for commitment from an identifiable figure. To another, it makes the narrative dependent on his decisions. The holder table gives that disagreement material form: encouragement does not distribute tokens more widely.

The bull and the attention market

At 15:15, in an earlier post separate from promotion of this contract, @slingoorio had already argued that traders exchange attention. He urged readers to ask whether a meme would stay visible and noted that views can be bought. The post does not announce this token; it provides particularly relevant context for what follows. [10]

The Black Bull makes that attention market almost literal. The name points toward the desired personality, artwork turns him into a mascot and the announced allocation seeks to give him a reason to stay. Participants then wait for a callout, a banner or another intervention. Each gesture becomes both part of the story and something to monitor.

The revealing result is that a token gift can organise so many public expectations without equally distributing the power behind them. Slingoor’s next chapter belongs in the actions around that central position: what its beneficiary does with it, and what everyone else can build without waiting for his next message.

Sources

Sources consulted on 2 November 2026. Figures reflect the cited snapshots and are not updated live.

1. Batman — annonce des 65 %, 2 novembre à 16 h 09
2. Slingoor — contrat et reprise de la formule, 17 h 23
3. Pump — marché, profil slingoor et répartition affichée
4. Pump — callout du profil slingoor sur ce contrat
5. Batman — réaction au callout avec le contrat exact
6. Helin Ulker — critique de l’envoi de tokens aux influenceurs
7. TheGTradesSol — comparaison promotionnelle avec Ansem
8. Slingoor — appel à idées pour une bannière, 17 h 54
9. M M B — proposition d’envoyer une bannière
10. sling — réflexion sur l’attention, 15 h 15
11. DEX Screener — contrat Solana, paire PumpSwap et identité visuelle
12. M4zter Cry — la « beg meta » dans les réponses